Purpose of the RPK Experiment

(Updated May 22, 2013)
The blog posts below are a running account of an experiment that began on August 14, 1965. It has taken this long to get it this simple and for technology to be available.

The present design is a descendant of the 1980s "PK Party" (spoon bending) developed by Jack Houck. Its purpose is to experience and explain the phenomenon of remote psychokinesis and to understand its uncertainties.

We are attempting to produce an NCR (non-consensus reality) event in a CR (consensus reality) frame of reference in order to learn how to apply what physicist/psychologist Arnold Mindell calls The Edge between Physics and Psychology in his seminal work Quantum Mind, published in 2000. We believe that this process will lead us to a more mature understanding of our physical and psychological capabilities, which will in turn help us develop deeper social responsibility for our planet in terms of raising our individual and collective awareness. We believe that this will help transform societal attitudes from ideological needs to subdue, dominate or control each other or other beings of all kinds (animate and inanimate). We believe that this can happen only by partnering and supporting each other in raising our mutual awareness in creative ways.

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Feedback from potential RPK "Influencers".

Posted: 4 July 2018
RPK Icon

On June 15, 2018, I sent a draft protocol proposal to several experienced people who expressed interest in advancing Phase 2. Caroline Cory's team will build the new prototype, based on my original device (now located at the University of Utah special collections library). When that phase 2 system is built, located and ready, we should be ready with a new protocol and schedule.

I received immediate feedback from three potential influencers, all of whom are located far from each other: Kyra, in Southern California, was first. (It was Kyra who, on July 12, 2015, made the first successful strike, albeit in a surprisingly unexpected way! [See earlier RPK blog post.] Next was Niko, in Albania. Obviously experienced and skilled, who offered supplemental video footage of some of his own documentary work and who made me aware of a potential hazard that we need to be alerted for. Third was Anita in South Africa, already well advanced personally, but eager to participate in a scientific approach. 

I will report the highlights of our communication as we proceed, along with my own responses for the record, as was done in phase one.

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Posted: 1 July 2018
Updated: 3 Jul 18

My protocol idea for RPK Phase 2 has changed since my last post on May 20. This is a consequence of several subsequent conversations and text messages from potential Phase 2 influencers, which now number about 7. Boy! Do I have a lot to learn!!

My most recent conversation was with Dennis, Caroline Cory's primary technical team member. I experienced many goose bump rushes as we talked. It felt like I was talking to a cosmic brother, even though I'm now feeling a bit like a Neanderthal. Nevertheless, I feel motivated and encouraged to continue the direction of this Phase 2 initiative.

As a professionally trained materials scientist, my personal focus continues to be on the "concept of mass", as modern physics refers to it. That is because I have been curious about matter, per se. What is it? Is it a thing? Does it have consciousness? "No!", I say. "Mass" in physics terms is an IDEA--a concept--not an object. As mentioned earlier, Caroline's focus is on the "nature of consciousness". In talking to Dennis about this distinction, it became apparent that these two different viewpoints are converging as we proceed with Phase 2.

To be continued with a new variation of the protocol, which will reflect my recent communications with the current group of potential influencers.

Sunday, May 20, 2018

RPK Experiment: Phase 2 Suggestions

RPK Icon

Posted: 8 May 2018
Updated: 20 May 18

In my April 29 telephone conversation with Caroline Cory (at George Weismann's introduction), I was surprised to learn that Caroline, herself, was capable of "micro" RPK (telekinesis?) in that she could affect electronic targets at significant distances, such as she being in Los Angeles and able to affect instruments in San Francisco at will. She sent me three email attachments showing multiple examples of evidence. 

As we talked during our first conversation, I became aware that her approach deals with "the nature of consciousness", whereas my approach had from the beginning (1965) dealt with "the concept of mass", as defined by physics. Then, a light began to dawn as I recalled the last email discussions with Kyra about some of her strange experiences in interacting with my equipment, which began to sound similar to Caroline's more recent experiences in interacting with the equipment of her colleagues. Could this be significant? I think so. 

It appears that both Caroline's and George's experimental experiences are dealing with small or "micro" effects, whereas mine is more "macro" in design. I discussed this with George in a subsequent Skype call and it occurred to us both that if one believes macro RPK is not possible, then it isn't for that person. Thus, could the issue really be one of belief or attitude? If so, then we are talking more about the nature of consciousness as well as a likely misunderstanding of the concept of mass. When Caroline became aware of Kyra's comments in the late RPK blog reports, she was impressed. 

George asked me to contact two more people about this. I have not yet done so, but will. Others are coming into the picture on FB and other internet avenues. New teams may be forming.

Phase 2 suggestions for a new team:

1. Construct another RPK device, similar to my original. We ought to make a standard design for practical reasons, where several can be made for varying groups, depending on interest and location. It is simple and non expensive to construct. 

I suggest its purpose be a "training" device where the objective is to identify a group of "influencers" who can teach others how to pass a "phase 2" test. That is, make one of the two hanging objects move without affecting the other. Successful Influencers will then be able to move to more advanced stages.

2. Recruit potential Phase 2 Influencers from those who are experienced astral travelers (beyond merely remote viewers). (Preferably non-military). I'm thinking of graduates from the Monroe Institute. (Perhaps there are other institutions that teach this capability?)

Interested readers of this far-out blog are invited to email me at enkovalenko@gmail.com. 

20 May 2018.
Last night Birgitta and I viewed Caroline Cory's new documentary film, which we received via USPS from her earlier in the day. It's title: "E.T. CONTACT; They Are Here". 

The film far exceeded my expectations by surprisingly connecting many, many dots in my own story. Clearly Caroline is on the forefront of the ET disclosure movement. 

Later in the evening she sent me an email with photos of her most recent attempt to do an RPK experiment from her place in Utah affecting George Weismann's telekinesis device at his home in Oregon. They were convincing, especially after having seen her documentary, since George demonstrated his capability to move a calibrated hanging object within closed transparent container. Otherwise, I doubt I'd have been able to appreciate the significance of her photos. 

Caroline has agreed to involve scientist members of her team in my Phase 2 by building a device similar to the one I recently took down and sent to the U of Utah special collections library. When she and they are ready, I will work with them to define a new protocol for at least four experienced micro RPK "influencers" who have agreed to participate and located in various parts of the world: California, Oregon, Utah and South Africa. The objective of Phase 2 is to develop a training protocol that will teach anyone to do macro RPK from any place in the world on a test object located at a specific location. Who knows what Phase 3 will be designed to do?! 

Which brings up a related subject. See next post titled "Did Genesis Man Conquer Space?"

This book, published in 1974, is out of print. Birgitta ordered it for me 25 years ago just after we were first married. For reasons I am now embarrassed to say, I did not read it because I dismissed it as having been written by some far right religious fanatic. Only this morning in conversation at breakfast about who built the pyramids and why, did I learn that she got the book originally from her father. I hadn't remembered any of that!

Sunday, May 6, 2018

RPK Experiment, Phase Two: A Fool's Errand?

RPK Icon

Posted: 6 May 2018
Updated: 8 May 18

UC Berkeley trained physicist Dr. George W. called me on May 6, 2018 to discuss my conversation with Caroline C. the previous Sunday (4/29) after having suggested earlier that morning that she and I get acquainted. It was uncanny timing--again.

To explain: after closing down the RPK experiment in March 2018 and sending the equipment to the University of Utah archives with suggestions for a phase two (should anyone be interested), I received a call from George, who had originally called me from his office in the Philippines in August 2013, after becoming aware of my experiment via the internet. He wanted initially to show me his own live version of what he called “telekinesis”, which was something I had been stubbornly, but unsuccessfully trying to do for over 50 years! (He had actually been trained to do this years earlier by Russian teachers at the St. Petersburg Bio-Sensory Institute!)

After George's original 2013 call and my witnessing (via Skype) his telekinesis device: a small, thin paper-like object slowly twisting on a fine silk thread inside a transparent "cone" on his office desk (while he continued talking to me!), I wondered then in my amazement if continuing my version of psychokinesis (PK) was now anything but a fool’s errand.

Nevertheless, something prompted me to stay stubborn. The significant difference between our two approaches brought a deeper sense of insight to my mind, although I could not yet verbalize it. (Even so, I kept remembering our first attempt in July 2009, where there had been an unexpected, apparently massive, but scattered result! See: https://rpkexperiment.blogspot.com/…/first-remote-pk-party.….)

After the above-mentioned first attempt at RPK on my apparatus at my place, we abandoned the "party" approach and focused on having a single "influencer" attempt to move just one of the two objects that were suspended within a closed, light-tight, air tight box, containing two motion activated cameras at right angles to record any movement at any time, without regard for witnesses and open to being viewed via the internet to viewers with ID and password. 

In December 2013, after reviewing George’s and my versions on my RPK blog, friend Kyra Kitts suggested she thought she could make mine work after all when she learned that George could not do so when he came to my home in October 2013 to inspect my setup. Kyra and I then worked out a new protocol. See: https://rpkexperiment.blogspot.com/2013/12/rpk-system-reactivated-temporarily.html.

Using the new protocol, Kyra's attempts became critical because of her attitude of openness. During one of her sessions she succeeded in actually moving one of the target objects without affecting the other! No one else has yet been able to do this, among many around the world who had attempted to do this in real time bio-feedback terms. Although the successful effect of one of her sessions was small, it was clearly detected and recorded by the equipment's movement-activated cameras. These data are now on the equipment hard drive currently at the U of Utah special collection archives. 

[NOTE: I was unsuccessful in copying that hard drive evidence onto a disk or thumb drive to present in this space. That will require someone more tech-savvy than I to access and operate that hard drive.]

To be continued... Phase 2 protocol suggestions

Friday, March 30, 2018

Closing down RPK Experiment

Posted: 30 March 2018
Updated: 29 Apr 18

Ready for shipment to University of Utah
In preparation for moving with wife Birgitta to her homeland in Sweden in the near future, I'm closing down the hardware part of the experiment and shipping off all equipment, along with the log book, to the University of Utah who has asked for my life's work materials.

The RPK experiment is ready for "Phase Two" by others, namely the development of a 'training device'. Below are suggestions to whomever will be interested to take over, how I think it might proceed.

Sunday, 29 April 2018
Today I spoke at length to friend George Weismann about the next phase of this RPK experiment. George then introduced me to another friend of his who has also demonstrated RPK ability herself, but on micro electronic devices and has produced documentary films about her work. That friend contacted me this evening and we discussed our respective approaches. We are now considering how "Phase Two" (above) may be done in partnership with her people. What a fine prospect! 

To be continued:

Monday, August 10, 2015

First significant RPK event!!!

Event: 12 July 2015
Updated: 10 Aug 15

Core RPK device

On July 12 during a second 48-hour session with operator Iota using the new protocol, the most significant event to date occurred. The silver disk swung significantly (it did not bounce!) without affecting the red disk, which red disk subsequently bounced slightly a few seconds later. This is the kind of behavior we have been looking for since two motion detection surveillance cameras were added to the system in 2009. 

More later...

Thursday, May 21, 2015

RPK experiment upgraded

Posted: 21 May 2015

"Disarm without Harm"
Updated RPK equipment

This post will make no sense to anyone not familiar with and sympathetic to the RPK Experiment.

Astral engineer Semyon Vendrov came to visit us in Los Alamos and inspect the RPK experimental set-up. I became all but certain that our equipment had broken down a year ago, when he first attempted to move the target object  via remote viewing from his home in Nevada.

This was not unlike our first attempt to perform the experiment in 2009, where Norma C was the remote viewer, working from Jack Houk's home in Huntington Beach, California, about a thousand miles away. At that time, instead of directly affecting our target here in Los Alamos, she and her support group, applying Jack Houk's "PK Party" approach, affected instead Jack's water heater, by moving it off its base! [Note similarity of the image of the water heater to that of the cylinder housing of the RPK experiment.] Obviously the energy involved was scattered and misdirected. That is what lead to abandoning the "Party" approach and to work with an individual remote viewer, sans support group energy.

We now have a team of 4 or 5 gifted remote viewers waiting for our current equipment to be ready.  Team member Quinn, a talented physicist, has generously contributed new recording motion detection equipment to the experiment, which he installed last Monday (5/18) evening (see photo), which now needs refined adjusting.

Semyon is now on his way back to Nevada and will be ready to try again soon. It is his task to work out the astral engineering protocol, so that we may test and vet others interested in becoming team members.

Our enterprise is governed by that which does not fear or react, but which does respond to inquiry and request when approached with the values of love, courage, humility, intelligence, commitment and patience.