Purpose of the RPK Experiment

Original post: 13 July 2009.
(Updated 17 July 2018: see PS below)
The blog posts below are a running account of an experiment that began on August 14, 1965. It has taken this long to get it this simple and for technology to be available.

The present design is a descendant of the 1980s "PK Party" (spoon bending) developed by Jack Houck. Its purpose is to experience and explain the phenomenon of remote psychokinesis and to understand its uncertainties.

We are attempting to produce an NCR (non-consensus reality) event in a CR (consensus reality) frame of reference in order to learn how to apply what physicist/psychologist Arnold Mindell calls The Edge between Physics and Psychology in his seminal work Quantum Mind, published in 2000. We believe that this process will lead us to a more mature understanding of our physical and psychological capabilities, which will in turn help us develop deeper social responsibility for our planet in terms of raising our individual and collective awareness. We believe that this will help transform societal attitudes from ideological needs to subdue, dominate or control each other or other beings of all kinds (animate and inanimate). We believe that this can happen only by partnering and supporting each other in raising our mutual awareness in creative ways.


PS. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright has given this experiment a clearer current explanation of purpose. In her Exoconscious Proposal: The Common Ground of Consciousness Science and Psychic Intelligence she writes "Today, extraterrestrial experiencers join growing numbers of vocal psychic experiencers: near death experiencers (NDE), out of body travelers (OBE), mediums, psychics and healers. Together these groups are urging, if not pushing, consciousness science to build a body of experiments and theories regarding consciousness as a non-local field. This growing psychic research has not gone unnoticed by classical scientists. Many of them are beginning to acknowledge consciousness as a fundamental field of reality... Exoconscious experiencers have living confirmation of the Extraterrestrial Presence. These experiencers have the potential to birth a social movement confirming the extraterrestrial presence. They have the power to propel the UFO/ET information mainstream in ways not possible with classical science."

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

A.T.'s Dance Continued

Posted: 1/3/ 2012;  Updated: 2/20/2012  (See Table 1.)

February 20, 2012:

Below are the results of a useful exchange with "A.T", who lives on the other side of the world. Because our exchanges eventually diverted from its original purpose, I felt it necessary to edit many personal exchanges, review the integrity of the experiment, and re-examine my own intentions. "A.T.'s" participation has been a healthy challenge and I hope one day we will take up where we left off. To use Robert Heinlein's famous concept, I am now in "grokking" mode, but still believe "A.T." has the potential to make this thing work.

Table 1 presents a running account of A.T.'s viewing sessions of the biofeedback (BFT) view of the RPK system, beginning with session #1 on 12/15/2011. Notice that there are several "undetermined" viewing time sessions (#3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 12). This is due to an unsolved setup problem with the recording technology. To bypass this problem (or when I can figure out the extraction mathematics!), "A.T.", as the viewer must view the system using a series of one-time-only ID/PW codes supplied via private communication. If A.T. forgets this restriction and instead uses the same ID/PW again, an indeterminate number in column B is produced. If done correctly the viewing time in column D should be the same number as in column B.

If this restriction is too cumbersome to remember and track, we may have to reprogram the BFT system to limit all sessions automatically to one view only.

On December 26, 2011, I was on travel and A.T. decided to wait until I returned before resuming A.T.'s participation in the experiment with session #12 on 1/3/2012. A.T. has expressed participation in terms of a "cosmic dance" with the selected (red) object, to which I heartily agree. I believe A.T. will know when "Red" decides to join in the dance and we will then check the surveillance record. It makes a rather boring protocol become more interesting. 

Table 1.  A.T's RPK/BFT account of viewing sessions
A           B                          C                                                D                                
(#)    (h:m:s)    (Date and time at end)       (viewing time)           
1       00:12:24    12/15/2011 @ 11:38:29         12:24
2       00:10:22    12/16/2011 @ 11:40:56         10:22
3       23:30:48    12/17/2011 @ 11:01:21               *
4       47:54:34    12/18/2011 @ 11:25:06               *
5       71:38:28    12/19/2011 @ 11:08:59               *
6       97:13:27    12/20/2011 @ 12:43:57               *

                             Revised Protocol
 7     00:09:42    12/21/2011 @ 12:35:01            9:42 
 8     00:12:47    12/22/2011 @ 12:04:30          12:47 
 9     20:53:22    12/23/2011 @ 08:45:03                *                          
10    00:09:34    12/23/2011 @ 11:31:44            9:34 
11    00:13:39    12/24/2011 @ 13:57:06          13:39
12  237:57:35    01/03/2012 @ 11:40:55                *                      
13    00:07:49    01/04/2012 @ 11:52:32            7:49
14    00:10:14    01/04/2012 @ 20:26:40          10:14
15    20:46:26    01/05/2012 @ 17:02:52                *

*actual viewing time undetermined

1 comment:

love said...

Eugene, I am still laughing for the picture..you are soo funny hard scientist.thanks for the pink color.
I am going to connect the BFT right now.