Purpose of the RPK Experiment

Original post: 13 July 2009.
(Updated 17 July 2018: see PS below)
The blog posts below are a running account of an experiment that began on August 14, 1965. It has taken this long to get it this simple and for technology to be available.

The present design is a descendant of the 1980s "PK Party" (spoon bending) developed by Jack Houck. Its purpose is to experience and explain the phenomenon of remote psychokinesis and to understand its uncertainties.

We are attempting to produce an NCR (non-consensus reality) event in a CR (consensus reality) frame of reference in order to learn how to apply what physicist/psychologist Arnold Mindell calls The Edge between Physics and Psychology in his seminal work Quantum Mind, published in 2000. We believe that this process will lead us to a more mature understanding of our physical and psychological capabilities, which will in turn help us develop deeper social responsibility for our planet in terms of raising our individual and collective awareness. We believe that this will help transform societal attitudes from ideological needs to subdue, dominate or control each other or other beings of all kinds (animate and inanimate). We believe that this can happen only by partnering and supporting each other in raising our mutual awareness in creative ways.

PS:

PS. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright has given this experiment a clearer current explanation of purpose. In her Exoconscious Proposal: The Common Ground of Consciousness Science and Psychic Intelligence she writes "Today, extraterrestrial experiencers join growing numbers of vocal psychic experiencers: near death experiencers (NDE), out of body travelers (OBE), mediums, psychics and healers. Together these groups are urging, if not pushing, consciousness science to build a body of experiments and theories regarding consciousness as a non-local field. This growing psychic research has not gone unnoticed by classical scientists. Many of them are beginning to acknowledge consciousness as a fundamental field of reality... Exoconscious experiencers have living confirmation of the Extraterrestrial Presence. These experiencers have the potential to birth a social movement confirming the extraterrestrial presence. They have the power to propel the UFO/ET information mainstream in ways not possible with classical science."



Friday, July 19, 2019

RPK, Phase 2. Run D (Caroline)

Posted: 19 July 2019
Updated: 

Raw data photos taken by iPhone of RPK DVR monitor. Click on images to enlarge.

June 11

June 12

June 13

June 14

June 15

To be updated and discussed.

RPK, Phase 2. Run C (Nancy)

Posted: 19 July 2019
Updated: 

Preliminary raw images for Run C. 

Photos taken by iPhone of RPK, Phase 2 DVR monitor


Click on images to enlarge
May 20

May 21
18 Aug 19 Note: In reviewing a short video of Nancy's May 21 run, I noticed two distinct movements of all three objects. The first was at 12:14:27 PM and at 07:09/08:30 on the video clip. The second, more intense movement of all objects came at 12:20:54. Below is the video:
May 21, 2019 video (run C)


May 22

May 23

May 24

May 25


To be continued...





Thursday, July 18, 2019

RPK, Phase 2. Run B screenshots (Anita)

Posted: 18 July 2019
Updated: 19 Jul 19

These photos are screenshots taken by my iPhone of the DVR play record for run B (Influencer Anita). The glare on the photos comes from the office window behind me while taking the shots and not an artifact of the experiment.

Click on photos to enlarge.
May 13, 2019

May 14, 2019

May 15, 2019

May 16, 2019

May 17, 2019

May 18, 2019

To be continued for all four Phase 2 runs and in greater detail, when I can figure out a better way to present the results to everybody.

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Run A First Day (7May19) Dilemma

Posted: 15 July 2019
Updated: 16 Jul 19

My current dilemma 
Monitor screen of RPK Phase 2, Run A, first day

This is screen shot of the first day of Run A (Influencer Kyra's run), which was taken on May 7, 2019 at noon MDT. The two upper windows are taken by DVR cameras 1 and 2. [See: https://rpkexperiment.blogspot.com/2019/01/rpk-phase-2-setup-update.html for placement of cameras.] The upper left window is taken by camera 1, focused on the side of the core container. The upper right window is taken by camera 2, focused on the objects from below. Camera 3 is located across the room to guarantee no outside mischief during a given run. [Note: window 4 on the lower right, which is assigned to camera 4, is deliberately inactive and thus dark.]

My dilemma is due to the mystery of the three green timeline "ribbons" below the windows. They cover a 12 hour period for all three cameras. Camera 1 produces the upper ribbon, camera 2 the middle one and camera 3 the lower one. My dilemma is in understanding the vertical yellow stripes and smears and how they correlate with each run. This particular photograph was taken shortly after noon and is indicated by a singular thin white vertical stripe in the middle of and crossing over all 3 of the 12-hour green ribbons.

So far I have been unable to detect or correlate any video movement of the objects with the yellow markers on the green timeline ribbons. 

IN ANY CASE, something is clearly happening, which is indicated by the yellow markers on the green timeline strips!

I've obviously got more consulting homework to do with the Night Owl surveillance technical support folks....

More later...

Sunday, July 7, 2019

RPK Phase 2 report delay

Posted: 7 July 2019
Updated:


Steven Greer's latest film, coming soon

This post is for my Exoconsciousness friends and colleagues, especially the four RPK Phase 2 influencers. Thanks to a FB heads up a day or two ago from Anita (Influencer B) and a text today from Influencer C wondering about Phase 2 report results, I'm prompted to explain why I'm still awaiting help from my Navajo Tech to compare the RPK DVR video results to Influencer log emails. 

Steven Greer's July 4 "False Flag Warning" on YouTube, thanks to Anita's heads up, has given me a sense that this delay may be related. In this video Greer mentions T. Townsend Brown's work in the 1920s, which answered many of my own technical questions. Also, you may be interested to know that Brown's daughter Linda became a friend in 2013, whom our Exoconsciousness colleague George Weismann also met at that time. This was in Santa Fe and included another experiencer, whose father Fred Steckling also worked with Linda's dad in collaboration with the controversial George Adamski. 

Also, a day or so after the four Phase 2 runs were completed, I came across a book mentioned on the internet titled "Searching for Mind over Matter". Of course that caught my attention and was immediately downloaded onto my Kindle. I was struck by the author's personal experience and decided to contact him. Would you be amazed that he lives in Los Alamos within walking distance to me and across the street from two of my RPK technical helpers?!! The protocol he develops in his book will greatly influence that of Phase 3. I was further amazed that this author took his engineering masters from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, under the direction of the dean of engineering, whose husband is our own Kyra, Influencer A!! 

These synchronicities are blowing my mind! But giving me a so-much-broader perspective on the implications of our Phase 2.  

This rambling is my feeble attempt to relax to the possibility that there are delaying influences beyond the best of intentions for getting the Phase 2 report done before now. 

Prayers for us and this project greatly appreciated. 

Eugene